well, it all depends on how you define ‘better people’

  • Date 27 Feb
Last week, Mashable smartypants Pete Cashmore asked whether social media makes us better people. You wouldn’t know it from my horribly derelict follow-up to his post, but this question sparked a whole lotta thought over here Chez Williams…

  • is there good in talking about an issue that affects us all as a global community? (I say yes)
  • does sharing information make us better people? (again, yes — it cultivates social inclusion and individual empowerment, and is the very tinder of social progress)
  • how can we measure this good? (no ideas as yet)
  • This isn’t a simple question
    Firstly, how do we define ‘being better people’? It’s a bit chewy and philosophical, but permit me to tangentalize for a mo. Social media is about talking, communicating. So if I engage in a certain behaviour, and then I talk and communicate about something inherently better, but I still behave in the same way, am I doing any (more) good (than I was before)? Utilitarians among us are going to say no.

    But not so fast…

    Is being good about doing good?
    This is no categorical sweeper of a statement, but I’d like to postulate that doing good is perhaps the culmination of being good. In terms of media and especially social media, talking about issues, telling stories, creating space in our culture for positive change… well I think that’s good. But talking, sharing, learning… these are good things, too.

    And what did Pete have to say on the matter?
    Alas, Cashmore’s title is a red herring. His actual query is a bit more practical than all that altruistic business: he wonders whether the knowledge that our words and actions are more likely to be captured (and shared and thus forever linked to us) will prompt us to be a little nicer to one another in the up-close here and now.

    Pete, I hope so. But as I live and breathe in the world’s CCTV hotspot, I’m not holding my breath.

    Still, thanks for the blog fodder, amigo.